2016, Cilt 46, Sayı 3, Sayfa(lar) 128-134 |
[ Türkçe Özet ]
[ PDF ]
[ Benzer Makaleler ]
|
Approach to Surgical Wound Infections from the Perspective of Antibiotic Control Team |
Nilay ÇÖPLÜ, Mustafa ÇAĞATAY, Nesibe AYGÜN ÜNAL, Şeyma SİNGER, Duygu ÖCAL |
Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Bölümü |
Keywords: microbial resistance, surgical wound, antibiotic control team |
Objective: In our hospital cefazolin is started before surgery in our
hospital for prophylaxis of surgical wound infections. If wound
infection develops then empirically teicoplanin or vancomycin for
gram positive, and; piperacillin-tazobactam for gram negative
bacteria are initiated. Antimicrobial therapy is readjusted
according to the results of culture and antimicrobial susceptibility
testing (AST). In this study the data were analyzed in order to
guide the choice of drug for empirical therapy and after the results
of AST were available.
Material and Methods: The wound culture materials sent to the
microbiology laboratory between December 1st, 2014 and
December 31st, 2015 were examined by direct Gram staining and
inoculated onto EMB and 5% sheep blood agar media. After
incubation, based on bacterial growth, microscopy results and- in
case of need-direct communication with the clinics, agents decided
to be a pathogen were identified and AST was performedusing
Phoenix automated systems (BD Diagnostic Systems, USA), disk
diffusion and gradient test (Liofilchem, Italy). AST was performed
and reported according to the criteria of “European Committee on
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Standards” (EUCAST), and
“Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute” (CLSI) cut-off points
were used when needed.
Results: In total 91 strains were isolated from policlinics (n=23),
clinics (n=44), and intensive care units (24). Fifty Enterobacteriaceae
(23 Escherichia coli), 29 non-fermenters (18 Acinetobacter spp.), 25
Staphylococcus spp. (17 Staphylococcus aureus), 5 Streptococcus spp.
and two Enterococcus spp. were isolated. The most effective
antimicrobials were amikacin (100% susceptible), carbapenems
(90%), colistin (100%), amikacin (100%) and piperacillin-tazobactam
(90%); trimethoprim-sulphametoxazole (100%), vancomycin (100%),
teicoplanin (100%), linezolid (100%), daptomycin (100%),
clindamycin (94%) and topical fusidic acid (92%).
Conclusion: According to our data, we think that it would be
suitable to start therapy as follows: colistin for gram negative
cocci of Acinetobacter spp; amikacin or carbapenems for bacilli;
topical fusidic acid, systemic trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or
clindamycin for gram positive cocci. The empirical treatment
policy in our hospital for gram negatives need to be changed since
priority is recommended to be given to group A drugs which were
found to be highly effective for gram positives. After pathogenic
bacteria are identified,, empirical treatment may be continued or
stopped according to the gram staining characteristics of bacteria.
After AST results are available it will be appropriate to switch to
effective group A antibiotics, if they are not effective then group B
antibiotics should be chosen. Group C antibiotics should be
avoided unless necessary.
|
[ Türkçe Özet ]
[ PDF ]
[ Benzer Makaleler ]
|