2017, Cilt 47, Sayı 4, Sayfa(lar) 185-189 |
[ Türkçe Özet ]
[ PDF ]
[ Benzer Makaleler ]
|
Evaluation of Varicella Zoster Virus Serologic Test Results in Patients Admitted to Ege University Faculty of Medicine |
Münevver KAYIN, Çağla Yıldız ALAGÖZ, Ayşın ZEYTİNOĞLU, İmre ALTUĞLU |
Ege Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, İzmir |
Keywords: VZV, serology, avidity |
Objective: Varicella zoster virus (VZV) is a member of
Herpesviridae family and is the responsible etiological agent in
two clinical forms as varicella (chicken pox) and zona (herpes
zoster). VZV which is the infectious agent of a treatable infection
based on accurate diagnosis is susceptible to antivirals. Serologic
VZV IgG avidity test is important as VZV Ig G test shows whether
the patient has ever acquired this infectionVZV IgG avidity test
helps to distinguish recent infection from the past; but is not
standardized yet. The aim of this study is to evaluate the VZV IgM
and IgG enzyme immunoassay (EIA) tests and VZV IgG avidity test
which we have started to use routinely and to determine our
routine laboratory diagnostic approach.
Material and Methods: A total of 5884 VZV IgG and 3570 VZV
IgM test and VZV IgG avidity test were performed in the patients
sera with the pre-diagnosis of VZV infection or request for viral
screening tests.
Results: In this study, of the 3570 samples tested with VZV IgM;
7.6% (273 samples) were positive, 3.4% (120 samples) were
borderline and 89% (3177) were negative. The number of VZV IgG
positive, negative, and borderline results were 4251 (72.2%), 1363
(23.2%) and 270 (4.6%) respectively. VZV IgG avidity test was
performed in a total of 24 samples including 15 samples clinically
not thought to be associated with varicella yet repeated VZV IgM
test result was positive for the disease, 2 samples of the patients
with clinical manifestations of varicella, and 7 samples of the
patients whose initial VZV IgM test gave borderline positivity,
however when the test was repeated it yielded positive/borderline/
negative result. Lower avidity indices were not detected in any
case, In only 4 cases borderline avidity index value was detected.,
while the remaining samples had high avidity indices.
Conclusion: In conclusion the VZV IgM enzyme immunoassay test
is not considered to be a suitable test in the confirmation of the
diagnosis of acute infection in the absence of clinical infection .
Unexpected positivity in VZV IgM tests is related to the lack of
standardization of EIA for the detection of these isotype antibodies.
The VZV IgG avidity test has not helped for the diagnosis. The
utility of VZV IgM and IgG avidity EIA tests were considered to be
limited in diagnosing acute infection.
|
[ Türkçe Özet ]
[ PDF ]
[ Benzer Makaleler ]
|